Web13 apr. 2024 · If you must use cannabis for medical purposes, discuss your situation with your employer and work together to find a reasonable accommodation. Employers should also have clear drug policies in place that outline the consequences of violating drug laws or company policies. Additional Considerations for Cannabis Use in the Workplace WebIf you’re feeling a little confused regarding the legalization of recreational marijuana and how it could impact your company’s drug-free work zone – you are not alone. Join us as legal expert Parker Thoeni answers these questions and more in this 1-hour webinar: Marijuana in the Workplace: An Employer’s Guide. Here’s a sample of what ...
Marijuana drug tests in the workplace would follow same …
Web31 mrt. 2024 · This article was originally published in Forbes on March 31, 2024.. Kentucky has become the 38th state in the U.S. to legalize cannabis for medical use.While the … Web21 feb. 2024 · In Wisconsin, for example, if an employee is injured in the workplace while intoxicated under any controlled substance, including marijuana, then the employer can … clarifying cloudy chicken stock
STAT LABS Drug Testing Center & Medical Laboratory on
Web8 feb. 2024 · The bill seeks to answer a workplace question that has been swirling in Colorado since voters passed Amendment 64 in 2012, legalizing the sale and use of recreational cannabis. Most states that have legalized medicinal and recreational pot leave the question over how to handle employees’ marijuana use up to employers, according … Web21 mrt. 2024 · Workplace Drug Testing Policy and Legalized Marijuana. Even though marijuana has been legalized in many US states, safety-sensitive workplaces still have zero-tolerance policies for marijuana and other drugs. Depending on the industry and where the company is located, workplaces utilize a variety of testing methods for … WebMedical cannabis and employment is a complex issue. You can refer to N.J.S.A. C.24:6I-6.1 in the Jake Honig Act, and the 2024 New Jersey Supreme Court case, Wild v … clarifying communication